11 Comments
User's avatar
J. Matson Heininger's avatar

I've come to the conclusion after watching months of slaughter and genocide courtesy the USA and Israel. That anyone who supports The ongoing misery and death dealing to the Palestinian people is a sociopath. That's a tough label, but what else can you say to the name RFK Jr but Sociopath.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

IMO ALL presidential candidates should be able to join a debate, not just those of the 2 parties. Not surprisingly Kennedy also denies meeting others, because if he does, people might realize there ARE other candidates! This whole political scene is so devastating. For you and the 2 others, it is like Don Quixote fighting windmills... I am so sorry because I think you are the most worthy candidate.

Expand full comment
Being Bonnie's avatar

Essentially a form letter with your name plugged in. Just head-shaking. The debate platform in general has all but disappeared in these DIS united states. The national debate stage was long ago wrenched from our hands when the League of Women Voters, long time sponsors of the presidential debates, 1988 withdrew their support in 1988. As then president Nancy Neuman put it in a live and printed press statement: "The League will no longer participate in the hoodwinking of the American public". (I include the video link here for your perusal).

https://youtu.be/e6ECHHDn_TA?si=sxbkGV6N-n701pc5

Little by little the debates became yet another corporate theft of the process and eventually disallowed any and all participants other than those from the duopoly. There is no audience, there are no audience questions, there are pre-determined questions from the moderators that candidates and their 'teams' have pre-approved and so on. So, as Neuman said, the 'organized' debates are the 'hoodwinking of the American public'.

One on one is another matter. In my humble opinion, NOT debating says everything about the candidate(s) refusing the challenge- fear of being exposed for who they really are. What else can we assume? And they know full well that if the public were 'allowed' to listen to and see other options- their chances diminish. Isn't that the point?

Emanuel, you go down in the books with other folks who've been denied the debate platform. It has happened to Jill Stein numerous times, Ralph Nader, Scott Horton, and untold others.

Hoodwinking, indeed!

Expand full comment
Amy Harlib's avatar

You sir, have my vote! RFK Jr and his hideous WEF running mate are fully captured by the globalist technocrat psychopath control freaks just as are the Rs and the Ds, two wings of the same vulture bird party, the party of G, rampant corporatist GREED.

Expand full comment
Piki's avatar
Aug 6Edited

In my virtual and spiritual realm, you are already the president. Not R.Kennedy Jr., not K.Harris, not Trump, not Ursula Von der Leyen, not Macron etc, and they never will be. Because none of them see through the mountains of mafia corporate corruptions. They are all still part of it. You were brave and kind to give it a try!

Why did R.Kennedy Jr. work with Charles Eisenstein? Was that just a façade?

Expand full comment
Zpycer's avatar

Beautiful.

Expand full comment
Judith L. Osterman's avatar

Fantastically eloquent response letter.

Expand full comment
Judith L. Osterman's avatar

I mean yours, of course!

Expand full comment
Jon Olsen's avatar

Tactfully and resectfully done!

Expand full comment
Jon Olsen's avatar

"respectfully"

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 24
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Emanuel Pastreich's avatar

I will give my speech on Sunday. Please do take a look. Which email works for you?

Expand full comment