Kim Iverson did a revealing interview with Jill Stein who back in 2016 seemed like the most sensible presidential candidate, however, when Iverson asked Stein about where she stood on the "mandated" toxic mRNA poison jab Stein said she didn't believe in the mandates, but "recommended" to anyone who asked that they take the jab.
Ugh, that's a no-no for me as any doctor especially one who has been preaching against the insidious policies of the security state and imperialist wars would now oddly believe the garbage about the efficacy of a dubious vaxx created by DARPA pushed by the DOD and manufactured by criminal pharmaceutical companies.
The scamdemic was certainly a relevatory litmus test as to who were co-opted stooges. Unfortunately, "Boobie" who stood tall during the scamdemic is a total nutjob when it comes to Israel. Oy vey! 😁
Yes! Although I think we need to speak the truth about the actual purpose of the Constitution, which has always been to make a powerful centralized government able to defend the wealth and power and privilege of the haves against the have-nots. The men who wrote the Constitution were deep in fear of another Shays's Rebellion of the have-nots breaking out and succeeding unless there was a stronger central Federal government to suppress it. And when the Whiskey Rebellion of the have-nots subsequently broke out, George Washington had his strong military force to suppress it, and did so. See: https://www.pdrboston.org/us-founding-fathers-enemy-of-the-pe
Party for Socialism and Liberation 2024 presidential candidate Claudia De La Cruz joins Briahna on Bad Faith podcast to weigh in on why it’s important to hand a socialist in the race, the third party debate, the failures of AOC & the squad, and what a movement to dismantle capitalism really looks like.
De la Cruz is running with another Latina, Karina Garcia, a Chicana organizer and educator. Garcia, a second-generation Mexican American, has “helped lead campaigns against landlord abuses, wage theft, and police brutality, as well as fights for reproductive justice, immigrants’ rights and student financial aid reform.” She is a founder of the Justice Center en El Barrio in New York City and a member of the Central Committee of the Party for Socialism and Liberation.
+--+
Just waking up in this shit hole is a clear indication that we, the 80 Percent, are the useless thinkers, eaters, drinkers, dreamers, hopers, defecatos, sleepers, blinkers, yawner to a large chunk of the Point Zero Zero One Percent, the One Percent, and their Eichmanns and Roy Cohns and Faustians, man, in the 5 Percent and the other 15 percent.
This is a mafia country, and Eugene Debbs and IWW are aberations for this slaver country, and now? Un-United $nake$ of AmeriKKK-Israel First.
Yep, that permanent aircraft carrier in the middle east, Isra-Hell.
+--+
Not to get too tribal, but we have to end this tribalism: Education: Harvard University, Harvard Medical School & goddamn, can we move away from the CHosen People?
Stein was born in Chicago, Illinois, the daughter of Gladys (née Wool) and Joseph Stein. She was raised in Highland Park, Illinois. Her parents were descended from Russian Jews, and Stein was raised in a Reform Jewish household, attending Chicago's North Shore Congregation Israel.
+--+
Bibi Blinken Kagan Nuland ZioAzovLensky, man oh man, the world is destroying because of these Jewish folk.
Stein was born in Chicago, Illinois, the daughter of Gladys (née Wool) and Joseph Stein. She was raised in Highland Park, Illinois. Her parents were descended from Russian Jews, and Stein was raised in a Reform Jewish household, attending Chicago's North Shore Congregation Israel.
This essay is one of the most ridiculous pieces of loopy nonsense I have ever read in my life. Folks, I'm in the Green Party and an active leader in it (in California). None of the bullshit this 'article' claims about the Green Party is true at all. For example..
1) Our presidential and other candidates don't have anything to do with 'running' the Green Party. The Green Party is run via an anarchist style consensus process. We have delegates from every county who go to state assemblies (and choose delegates to national assemblies) in which we make almost all decisions by mutual agreement, and when we have to vote due to disagreement, we vote by supermajority. (For example our 2016 vote to formally establish the Green Party US as anti-capitalist, won by 78%.)
2) As noted above, the Green Party is ANTI-CAPITALIST and we take *no* donations from any corporations or other businesses, or even foundations. The Green Party is run *solely* on small donations from individuals. This is what make the Green Party so different in US politics. And *because* the Green Party is anti-capitalist and run only on individual donations, we literally don't have any money to 'steal'. The idea that there is financial grift is utterly laughable.
3) The Green Party has gotten hundreds of local candidates elected to office since it was founded in the mid 1980s. Here are links to some of our recently elected candidates.
4) Both Jill Stein, and the Green Party US as a whole, strongly oppose wars, and strongly oppose Israel's occupation and genocide on the Palestinians. Besides opposing Israel we also strongly oppose the US/NATO proxy war in Ukraine. Here are links to these positions:
Instead of idiotically pontificating out of their ass like Emanuel about a party he clearly knows nothing about, anyone can see what the Green Party US is about by reading our platform (which is amazing, and is what attracts people to the Green Party) at the following link..
Dear Eric, I am happy to rejoin the Green Party and join in the struggle for democracy and equality in the United States today. No problem. I suggest we start first with an open discussion, debate, between you and myself about the very issues you raise here. I am certain that Green Liberty will be happy to host this debate and that we can broadcast it to the nation. In fact, I am happy to let you go first and give you more than enough time to make your case. If you would like a few other members of the Green Party to join us, we are most certainly happy to have them. I wanted most of all to have debates and discussions about our future while running in the Green Party. Sadly, that never happened.
Emanuel, I think it is sufficient to simply debate this right here on the thread. But before we can even debate, there actually need to be facts and evidence on the table. In your ridiculous screed above, you don't provide even one link to one piece of evidence to any of your claims. You can start there. Post evidence of your empty claims.
It is not true that there are no links. But there might not be in my reposting.
I do not support everything in the statement that I reposted and in fact I have had a good relationship with Jill Stein personally and I insisted in reaching out to her and to Cornel West as part of my campaign. So if we are going to have a debate in written form--which is not my favorite approach but which is possible--I suggest that we both, Emanuel and Eric, commit to engage in this process for a few days, with no rush to respond as we want to be accurate and honest.
The first step will be for me to say that I do not agree with everything that Gloria Guillo wrote and that it is best for me to speak about my own experience in the Green Party and what I think was so profoundly wrong.
If we can do that, then yes, please let us continue the conversation. If you, Eric, are interested in creating a Green Party that will win, then let us join forces. Let us start rather with my own article:
No excuse me.. You don't post an article that is a carpet bombing of endless ridiculous falsehoods that would be incredibly damning if they were true (they're not) and then backpedal post hoc (because somebody actually called you out for your irresponsible bullshit) with the gutless weasel phrase "I do not support everything in the statement that I reposted"..
Furthermore, you are so clownishly inept in your slipshod blogging that the statement you posted looks like *you* wrote it. Your name is prominently at the top, as if you are the author, and Gloria's name doesn't appear anywhere in the essay.
Regardless you need to post actual credible, objective links to prove what you are claiming, or you are not debating, you are instead whingeing, likely in an attempt to get clicks by purposely using outright falsehoods to provoke a reader response.
The bottom line is that until you can show actual links to any evidence proving that what you are claiming about your (or Gloria's) experience has even one shred of credibility, any debate with you (even on this thread) is equivalent to debating with a moldy wall, and a waste of everyone's time.
You have yet to post evidence. I and your minuscule substack audience are waiting..
First I am happy to issue an apology and retraction for posting something which I did not write in a manner that might lead people to think I posted it.
What do you think is the best way to do so?
There can be no doubt that an enormous number of Green Party members would highly value a debate between you and me, especially as I was never inherently hostile to Jill Stein or Cornel West, as much as I disagreed with them. Your colorful statements suggesting that debating with me is like "debating with a moldy wall" sound like they come from a handbook for anti "disinformation" campaigns such as those run by Booz Allen Hamilton or CASI on Homeland Security Budgets. Have you ever taken consulting work from any private consulting or intelligence firms?
Nope. Sorry. That last reply was your third opportunity to post links with actual facts, and you did not do so, so we are done. And the fact that you actually believe that "Green Party members" would somehow benefit from a 'debate' with you in it, when you have shown you could not argue your way out of a wet paper sack if someone gave you a samurai sword with which to do so, would be amusing if it were not so embarrassing.
And for the record, as I already posted above (and you completely ignored because it doesn't fit your false narrative) the Green Party is already a winning party, and has elected hundreds of candidates to office since the 1980s. The fact that you are myopically focusing only on the presidential election shows you don't have the slightest clue what you are talking about. (Which is perhaps why you are dependent on a publication focused on Korea, the other side of the planet, to publish your nonsense.)
To repeat, I've already sufficiently debunked your horseshit on this thread, so we are done.
And so the dogs have been let of their fucking cages.
Jews, uh?
More than just Zionism as Neo Judaism.
Way beyond fucking voting for scum x over viron y.
Crazy, no?
Quoting:
In early November, the American Institute ‘Jewish Electorate’ conducted measurements of public sentiment in the diaspora and came to two main conclusions.
1) An overwhelming majority (74%) of American Jews approve of President Biden's handling of the conflict between Israel and Hamas.
2) In the presidential race, American Jews clearly prefer Biden (68%) over Trump (22%).
Interestingly, in the entire Jewish community there is only one group that likes Trump: Orthodox Jews.
Kim Iverson did a revealing interview with Jill Stein who back in 2016 seemed like the most sensible presidential candidate, however, when Iverson asked Stein about where she stood on the "mandated" toxic mRNA poison jab Stein said she didn't believe in the mandates, but "recommended" to anyone who asked that they take the jab.
Ugh, that's a no-no for me as any doctor especially one who has been preaching against the insidious policies of the security state and imperialist wars would now oddly believe the garbage about the efficacy of a dubious vaxx created by DARPA pushed by the DOD and manufactured by criminal pharmaceutical companies.
The scamdemic was certainly a relevatory litmus test as to who were co-opted stooges. Unfortunately, "Boobie" who stood tall during the scamdemic is a total nutjob when it comes to Israel. Oy vey! 😁
Yes! Although I think we need to speak the truth about the actual purpose of the Constitution, which has always been to make a powerful centralized government able to defend the wealth and power and privilege of the haves against the have-nots. The men who wrote the Constitution were deep in fear of another Shays's Rebellion of the have-nots breaking out and succeeding unless there was a stronger central Federal government to suppress it. And when the Whiskey Rebellion of the have-nots subsequently broke out, George Washington had his strong military force to suppress it, and did so. See: https://www.pdrboston.org/us-founding-fathers-enemy-of-the-pe
No
Forget this country . . . . In God We Trust?
Party for Socialism and Liberation 2024 presidential candidate Claudia De La Cruz joins Briahna on Bad Faith podcast to weigh in on why it’s important to hand a socialist in the race, the third party debate, the failures of AOC & the squad, and what a movement to dismantle capitalism really looks like.
https://youtu.be/1lMNs8A83fc?si=eTTpyDefGfsssE2V
De la Cruz is running with another Latina, Karina Garcia, a Chicana organizer and educator. Garcia, a second-generation Mexican American, has “helped lead campaigns against landlord abuses, wage theft, and police brutality, as well as fights for reproductive justice, immigrants’ rights and student financial aid reform.” She is a founder of the Justice Center en El Barrio in New York City and a member of the Central Committee of the Party for Socialism and Liberation.
+--+
Just waking up in this shit hole is a clear indication that we, the 80 Percent, are the useless thinkers, eaters, drinkers, dreamers, hopers, defecatos, sleepers, blinkers, yawner to a large chunk of the Point Zero Zero One Percent, the One Percent, and their Eichmanns and Roy Cohns and Faustians, man, in the 5 Percent and the other 15 percent.
This is a mafia country, and Eugene Debbs and IWW are aberations for this slaver country, and now? Un-United $nake$ of AmeriKKK-Israel First.
Yep, that permanent aircraft carrier in the middle east, Isra-Hell.
+--+
Not to get too tribal, but we have to end this tribalism: Education: Harvard University, Harvard Medical School & goddamn, can we move away from the CHosen People?
Stein was born in Chicago, Illinois, the daughter of Gladys (née Wool) and Joseph Stein. She was raised in Highland Park, Illinois. Her parents were descended from Russian Jews, and Stein was raised in a Reform Jewish household, attending Chicago's North Shore Congregation Israel.
+--+
Bibi Blinken Kagan Nuland ZioAzovLensky, man oh man, the world is destroying because of these Jewish folk.
Stein was born in Chicago, Illinois, the daughter of Gladys (née Wool) and Joseph Stein. She was raised in Highland Park, Illinois. Her parents were descended from Russian Jews, and Stein was raised in a Reform Jewish household, attending Chicago's North Shore Congregation Israel.
+--+
Here, LowKey for MP?
https://www.youtube.com/live/eDCnAKBD_lk?si=zwgarFaAWKEUiqhD
+--+
Richard Medhurst is amazing:
https://rumble.com/c/richardmedhurst
+--+
Americans are lobotomized, neutered, in constant Stockholm Syndrome, etc.
https://paulokirk.substack.com/p/an-insipid-society-that-has-the-dementia
This essay is one of the most ridiculous pieces of loopy nonsense I have ever read in my life. Folks, I'm in the Green Party and an active leader in it (in California). None of the bullshit this 'article' claims about the Green Party is true at all. For example..
1) Our presidential and other candidates don't have anything to do with 'running' the Green Party. The Green Party is run via an anarchist style consensus process. We have delegates from every county who go to state assemblies (and choose delegates to national assemblies) in which we make almost all decisions by mutual agreement, and when we have to vote due to disagreement, we vote by supermajority. (For example our 2016 vote to formally establish the Green Party US as anti-capitalist, won by 78%.)
2) As noted above, the Green Party is ANTI-CAPITALIST and we take *no* donations from any corporations or other businesses, or even foundations. The Green Party is run *solely* on small donations from individuals. This is what make the Green Party so different in US politics. And *because* the Green Party is anti-capitalist and run only on individual donations, we literally don't have any money to 'steal'. The idea that there is financial grift is utterly laughable.
3) The Green Party has gotten hundreds of local candidates elected to office since it was founded in the mid 1980s. Here are links to some of our recently elected candidates.
Green mayors: https://gpus.org/elections/green-mayors
California elected Greens: http://www.cagreens.org/green-officeholders
4) Both Jill Stein, and the Green Party US as a whole, strongly oppose wars, and strongly oppose Israel's occupation and genocide on the Palestinians. Besides opposing Israel we also strongly oppose the US/NATO proxy war in Ukraine. Here are links to these positions:
Palestine: https://www.gp.org/democracy#Palestine
Ukraine: https://www.gp.org/ukraine_war
Instead of idiotically pontificating out of their ass like Emanuel about a party he clearly knows nothing about, anyone can see what the Green Party US is about by reading our platform (which is amazing, and is what attracts people to the Green Party) at the following link..
https://www.gp.org/platform
Eric Brooks
Green Party of California
Dear Eric, I am happy to rejoin the Green Party and join in the struggle for democracy and equality in the United States today. No problem. I suggest we start first with an open discussion, debate, between you and myself about the very issues you raise here. I am certain that Green Liberty will be happy to host this debate and that we can broadcast it to the nation. In fact, I am happy to let you go first and give you more than enough time to make your case. If you would like a few other members of the Green Party to join us, we are most certainly happy to have them. I wanted most of all to have debates and discussions about our future while running in the Green Party. Sadly, that never happened.
Most sincerely,
Emanuel Pastreich
Emanuel, I think it is sufficient to simply debate this right here on the thread. But before we can even debate, there actually need to be facts and evidence on the table. In your ridiculous screed above, you don't provide even one link to one piece of evidence to any of your claims. You can start there. Post evidence of your empty claims.
cue crickets..
It is not true that there are no links. But there might not be in my reposting.
I do not support everything in the statement that I reposted and in fact I have had a good relationship with Jill Stein personally and I insisted in reaching out to her and to Cornel West as part of my campaign. So if we are going to have a debate in written form--which is not my favorite approach but which is possible--I suggest that we both, Emanuel and Eric, commit to engage in this process for a few days, with no rush to respond as we want to be accurate and honest.
The first step will be for me to say that I do not agree with everything that Gloria Guillo wrote and that it is best for me to speak about my own experience in the Green Party and what I think was so profoundly wrong.
If we can do that, then yes, please let us continue the conversation. If you, Eric, are interested in creating a Green Party that will win, then let us join forces. Let us start rather with my own article:
"A Green Party that will win"
https://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=124384
That is a much more constructive and concrete critique.
No excuse me.. You don't post an article that is a carpet bombing of endless ridiculous falsehoods that would be incredibly damning if they were true (they're not) and then backpedal post hoc (because somebody actually called you out for your irresponsible bullshit) with the gutless weasel phrase "I do not support everything in the statement that I reposted"..
Furthermore, you are so clownishly inept in your slipshod blogging that the statement you posted looks like *you* wrote it. Your name is prominently at the top, as if you are the author, and Gloria's name doesn't appear anywhere in the essay.
Regardless you need to post actual credible, objective links to prove what you are claiming, or you are not debating, you are instead whingeing, likely in an attempt to get clicks by purposely using outright falsehoods to provoke a reader response.
The bottom line is that until you can show actual links to any evidence proving that what you are claiming about your (or Gloria's) experience has even one shred of credibility, any debate with you (even on this thread) is equivalent to debating with a moldy wall, and a waste of everyone's time.
You have yet to post evidence. I and your minuscule substack audience are waiting..
Let us address this matter in order.
First I am happy to issue an apology and retraction for posting something which I did not write in a manner that might lead people to think I posted it.
What do you think is the best way to do so?
There can be no doubt that an enormous number of Green Party members would highly value a debate between you and me, especially as I was never inherently hostile to Jill Stein or Cornel West, as much as I disagreed with them. Your colorful statements suggesting that debating with me is like "debating with a moldy wall" sound like they come from a handbook for anti "disinformation" campaigns such as those run by Booz Allen Hamilton or CASI on Homeland Security Budgets. Have you ever taken consulting work from any private consulting or intelligence firms?
Nope. Sorry. That last reply was your third opportunity to post links with actual facts, and you did not do so, so we are done. And the fact that you actually believe that "Green Party members" would somehow benefit from a 'debate' with you in it, when you have shown you could not argue your way out of a wet paper sack if someone gave you a samurai sword with which to do so, would be amusing if it were not so embarrassing.
And for the record, as I already posted above (and you completely ignored because it doesn't fit your false narrative) the Green Party is already a winning party, and has elected hundreds of candidates to office since the 1980s. The fact that you are myopically focusing only on the presidential election shows you don't have the slightest clue what you are talking about. (Which is perhaps why you are dependent on a publication focused on Korea, the other side of the planet, to publish your nonsense.)
To repeat, I've already sufficiently debunked your horseshit on this thread, so we are done.
This is not about the party. This is about Jill Stein and her allegiance to Putin.
You’re straight making shit up!
She and the professor exited the Green party weeks ago. Get your shit straight.
And so the dogs have been let of their fucking cages.
Jews, uh?
More than just Zionism as Neo Judaism.
Way beyond fucking voting for scum x over viron y.
Crazy, no?
Quoting:
In early November, the American Institute ‘Jewish Electorate’ conducted measurements of public sentiment in the diaspora and came to two main conclusions.
1) An overwhelming majority (74%) of American Jews approve of President Biden's handling of the conflict between Israel and Hamas.
2) In the presidential race, American Jews clearly prefer Biden (68%) over Trump (22%).
Interestingly, in the entire Jewish community there is only one group that likes Trump: Orthodox Jews.