I am sympathetic to that argument, but feel we have the Constitution now and need to start there. But the ARticles of Confederation were closer to the spirit of the Iroquois Great Law and the wisdom of the ancients
That’s actually an interesting speculation, Keith, though personally myself I can’t help but think that the Articles of Confederation wouldn’t have produced a better utopia since confederations historically feed into “class collaborationist”-esque oligarchies, if I understand correctly (though do correct me if I’m wrong).
Though your point on the Constitution and Federalists probably deserves some attention and likely credence: America as it was set up was apparently the product of Jesuit/Illuminist concepts (https://www.jamesjpn.net/conspiracy/the-jesuit-led-vatican-and-the-anglo-american-israeli-empire/) sneakily disguised behind a false guise of “liberty,” not to mention D.C.’s Masonic architecture revolving around the number 13 and the Satanic pentagram. Also the Washington Monument is 555 feet tall, probably since 666 belongs to the title of America’s superiors/controllers sitting at Rome. (cf. Walter Veith’s Total Onslaught lecture “Revolutions, Tyrants, and Wars”)
If I remember correctly from 5th grade history lessons, the Bill of Rights was only added due to popular concerns outside what the Founders originally wanted. And the Federalists ultimately became Anglophile elitist traitors to America (I believe Alexander Hamilton was genuinely patriotic though, as his National Bank was part of an insurgent economic nationalist program to industrialize America against Angloimperialism), as did the Anti-Federalists under Jefferson. Anton Chaitkin mentions in Treason in America that the Federalist Essex Junto elites were part of an Anglophile club which later ran secessionist pseudo-“ultra-abolitionist” terrorism from the northern side in controlled clashes with southern Scottish Rite Freemasonic slaveholder elites tied to Albert Pike and Giuseppe Mazzini. Those neo-“Federalist” northeastern elites later outed themselves by Reconstruction and the Gilded Age as British free trade shills. Rebranding themselves as “Liberals” since mid-Reconstruction, these faux reactionary “reformers” kept James G. Blaine out of the White House in 1884 after Garfield was assassinated and Conklingite bootlicker Chester Arthur became president. Arthur installed Anglophile Frederick T. Frelinghuysen (whose son was a firm partner of the Rothschild-owned Belmonts, who also hated Blaine) as Secretary of State to replace Blaine, and Frelinghuysen cancelled the Pan-American Conference that was a thorn in the flesh to British imperialism over at South America. Though you may or may not remember me mentioning this in my first “Anglosubversion” posting from last year. :)
Not sure if you are laughing or crying or both!
It makes a lot of sense!
We should have stayed at the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was the Federalists evil plan to copy a Monarchy. Will no more We the people
I am sympathetic to that argument, but feel we have the Constitution now and need to start there. But the ARticles of Confederation were closer to the spirit of the Iroquois Great Law and the wisdom of the ancients
With^ not will
That’s actually an interesting speculation, Keith, though personally myself I can’t help but think that the Articles of Confederation wouldn’t have produced a better utopia since confederations historically feed into “class collaborationist”-esque oligarchies, if I understand correctly (though do correct me if I’m wrong).
Though your point on the Constitution and Federalists probably deserves some attention and likely credence: America as it was set up was apparently the product of Jesuit/Illuminist concepts (https://www.jamesjpn.net/conspiracy/the-jesuit-led-vatican-and-the-anglo-american-israeli-empire/) sneakily disguised behind a false guise of “liberty,” not to mention D.C.’s Masonic architecture revolving around the number 13 and the Satanic pentagram. Also the Washington Monument is 555 feet tall, probably since 666 belongs to the title of America’s superiors/controllers sitting at Rome. (cf. Walter Veith’s Total Onslaught lecture “Revolutions, Tyrants, and Wars”)
If I remember correctly from 5th grade history lessons, the Bill of Rights was only added due to popular concerns outside what the Founders originally wanted. And the Federalists ultimately became Anglophile elitist traitors to America (I believe Alexander Hamilton was genuinely patriotic though, as his National Bank was part of an insurgent economic nationalist program to industrialize America against Angloimperialism), as did the Anti-Federalists under Jefferson. Anton Chaitkin mentions in Treason in America that the Federalist Essex Junto elites were part of an Anglophile club which later ran secessionist pseudo-“ultra-abolitionist” terrorism from the northern side in controlled clashes with southern Scottish Rite Freemasonic slaveholder elites tied to Albert Pike and Giuseppe Mazzini. Those neo-“Federalist” northeastern elites later outed themselves by Reconstruction and the Gilded Age as British free trade shills. Rebranding themselves as “Liberals” since mid-Reconstruction, these faux reactionary “reformers” kept James G. Blaine out of the White House in 1884 after Garfield was assassinated and Conklingite bootlicker Chester Arthur became president. Arthur installed Anglophile Frederick T. Frelinghuysen (whose son was a firm partner of the Rothschild-owned Belmonts, who also hated Blaine) as Secretary of State to replace Blaine, and Frelinghuysen cancelled the Pan-American Conference that was a thorn in the flesh to British imperialism over at South America. Though you may or may not remember me mentioning this in my first “Anglosubversion” posting from last year. :)
I remember you writing about that . Now I have to re read it , thanks
Glad to hear, and you're most definitely welcome, Keith. Beyond happy to help refresh your memory when possible.
“America is the very incarnation of doom. She will drag the whole world down to the bottomless pit.”
― Henry Miller, Tropic of Cancer