What a sad state of affairs that James Corbett followed up on his recent reposting of a report on the dangers of MGOs “Open Seeds: Biopiracy and the Patenting of Life” by releasing this report that makes fun of climate change as a foolish prank played by globalists.
Emanuel, your willingness to always put things on the table and allow everyone their freedom of speech and view is commendable and honorable. I truly appreciate that in anyone who upholds freedom of speech. I am a dedicated environmentalist if you could call it that, and used to be very caught up in the "climage chance" debate. That was years ago when the term was actually censored on many platforms such as Fox News (who woulda thunk!) Nonetheless, now the term is bandied about copiously. But it's the wrong term! Climage change is a misnomer because the climate is always changing and so we will have endless useless debates about that term. How about we call it what it really is - POLLUTION ? If we called it pollution then we would all see our part in it - and we all play a part in it. Just because petrochemical companies take advantage of our sloth, doesn't mean we're not similarly responsible. Because we buy their products and we waste, waste, waste so much. Yet we never point hte finger at ourselves. It's like the public always gets a free ticket when really - we are the ones with the power. What we do has all the meaning in the world. I truly admire your honestly. Thank you for always speaking up.
That is why I prefer the term “climate destabilization” rather than climate change.
Emanuel is completely correct, there is almost universal scientific consensus concerning the high levels of carbon in the atmosphere due to fossil fuel burning and the warming of the planet.
I would also say that the denial of the above is bound up with an inability to question the Capitalist system of endless growth as a driver of the degradation of the earth systems.
The good news is that there are energy sources sometimes termed “free energy” the exietence of which have been suppressed since before I was born. For more on that see the Substack of Wade Frazier.
netzero is a scam. Carbon is not our enemy. Carbon is not the knob that runs the climate. In the overall historyof atmospheric temperatures, we are nowhere near to being in a heat spike. See "Climate: The Movie"
The climate change lobby has become a bloated, corrupt and monopolistic industry. Those who want to highlight climate change by and large avoid paying attention to the disastrous consequences of geo-engineering, much of it military. See "Carbon Is Not the Enemy. End Chemtrails!"
And what about geoengineering clouds - what do they do to affect the heat entrapment? And yes free energy - we are so twisted and abused by authorities that it's really difficult to get one's head around. But that we hold authorities in superiority to ourselves is really the underlying problem to all problems.
Yes, geoengineering is taking place as well as a means to try and offset the deleterious effects of climate collapse. Please check out weatherwar101 on YouTube which has as far as I can see the broadest view on this.
I hate to sound skeptical but who allowed them to do this? Why do they not explain it? How can it "mitigate climage collapse"? What is in those things? Is it causing poisoning of the water, soil or human and animal bodies? Why the secrecy around it? Is it to avoid having to answer questions that will expose the true purpose of "climate change", covid, 9/11, fluoridation of the water, GMO's, gender benders, and all the other schemes I haven't even mentioned that are direct attacks on nature and thus - ourselves?
I don't want to read through copious articles. Tell me why geoengineering is supposedly offsetting "climate collapse"? The mere term makes me squnt as the climate is different everywhere. Oh and by the way - how much has the water risen in 50 years? I see absolutely no rise whatsoever but I'm willing to hear other stories.
The chemtrails provide a medium of condensation for cloud formation which aids rainfall. Air pollution particles are generally too small to provide such a medium.
Oh. So chemtrails are good!? Sometimes the poisoned clouds are so thick they hover on the surface of the earth. From the taste, the smell, the sting is the eyes you can tell these chemical fog patches are toxic. If chemtrails are so good for us, why don't the perpetrators come forward to boast about it. Why is it all so hush hush?
I resent having our skies and our clean water and our fresh air stolen from us by dark shadowy forces. These forces seem to operate through similar tactics employed by those engaged in depopulating us, enfeebling us, and enslaving us through a variety of methods including jabbed us with bioweapon disguised as a remedy for a novel coronavirus. Chemtrails are composed of pollution. They are not a remedy for global warming and pollution.
Though I love your name, you provide no evidence to support that statement. And why weren't we told about it? Where did you hear about this? How do we know that would work? And what is in those things and how is "providing a medium of condensation for cloud formation" and what proof that it aids rainfall?
Yes that's right. And if the UN was serious about capturing CO2 they would be espounsing the many benefits of growing and using hemp, bamboo and kenaf. But n'er a word about these...
Your iracibility & lack of research highlights WHY James Corbett - & frankly myself too - can't be bothered dealing with indoctrinated Americans..
Mate, I shall say this only once
A. Climate change global warming is a ruse created by JFK & then LBJ to establish
"How the rich men of the Earth can control humanity in an extended time of peace"
Or IOW the SAME question the CARNEGIE FOUNDATION asked in 1911 when it decided there WAS NO ANSWER in a time of peace hence after the FED was criminally established via Wilson Treason THEY FUNDED WWI
In 1967 tho the 15 professionals asked recommended
1. A humanity uniting climate catastrophe
AND
2. A humanity uniting mock alien invasion replete with real USAF bombers
This total hogwash was then introduced by David Rockefeller to the Club of Rome 1968 & their UN has run with this carbon tax administrative tyranny & extortion ever since
Rockefeller & Brzezinski even created the Trilateral Commission in 1973 to coordinate their BS across the world
Sooo
SEARCH FOR
REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN - A BLUEPRINT FOR TYRANNY (1967)
And you will see - as James tires of pointing out - like everything else in your idiot country
Climate change is part of the industry of social engineering. Trillions and Billions of dollars and millions of jobs depend on the controversial aspects. Of course there’s climate change and it happens every second. The cumulative effects are nothing new under the sun.
Hello Emanuel, I thought I was the only one. Yes, Corbett has the wrong end of the stick about many things.There are so many in 'health freedom' who ridicule those who've looked into the evidence for climate change- I am convinced that they are not just reader supported either. I know for a fact that Free Speech Union and lockdown skeptic Toby Young is funded by BP. I have been blocked by many for pointing out the science on climate change https://jowaller.substack.com/p/oooo-now-ive-been-banned-by-mike?utm_source=publication-search
If organizations really believed that petrochemicals are damaging the climate, why do they continue to receive subsidies (and massive ones at that)? Why don't renewable energies receive the subsidies? All it is is a money-making venture like 9/11 was for weapons and surveillance manufacturers.
Why indeed. Of course fossil fuel industries know that petrochemicals are damaging the environment, just like big tobacco knew that smoking was harmful -that’s why they lobby government so hard - and continue to get subsidies. They also fund climate denial groups like the Heartland Institute to create doubt. Doubt is their product. Petrochemical imperialism and climate change are real-9/11, covid and climate change being a hoax are the hoaxes.
When I still believed in the climate change hoax (yes, I too was once a lazy, ignorant conformist and dupe of the Globalists!) I felt distinctly uncomfortable when Corbett expressed his scepticism about the climate change hoax. Now, after a week of intense, cold rain in Europe, which has left death and destruction in its wake, I'm grateful that Corbett actually did his homework and spoke the truth. He was right and the lazy, ignorant, dupes of the Globalists were wrong. The belief in "global warming" is nihilistic and murderous and is no different to the brainwashing conducted by the Nazis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfRG8-RHEI
When you start valorizing guys that self-promote, and PT Barnum topics, well, then, here we are, no?
Systems thinking. Taking people out of their silos. Yeah, tell ice-core scientists from dozens of countries that they are in a conspiracy. Sure, Russian scientist studying ice cores and shelfs, they are in a conspiracy with Yankee scientists.
But again, mitigation, moving cities from vulnerable areas, collective action, well, that's not happening while wet bulb temperatures are going out the roof and killing people, and while floods occur, and infrastructure is abaondoned because of the Jewish Century of the Samson Option -- Middle East and Ukraine.
Making money on carbon credits? Making money on junk plastics? Making money on this or that scheme. Green is the new black.
Simple experiment third graders should be doing all over U$A, but in the U$A, K12 is sieg heil training to be compliant, feat the boss, be all you can be as a drone operator, maker or inventor of more dual use military killing devices.
Booby trapping minds, as John Taylor Gatto would say, RIP.
Last time, we saw a relationship between CO2 and temperature. We decided to investigate how more CO2 in the atmosphere can cause an increase in temperature.
We decide we need to design an investigation to model how more CO2 causes an increase in temperature.
We brainstorm some ideas for where we can find CO2 easily, and we remember that when soda fizzes, it releases CO2. We talk about ways we can create an easy but effective method to release CO2, capture it, and then be able to model how CO2 can cause an increase in air temperature.
We plan and carry out an investigation with two soda bottles, where we test out the idea that CO2 can cause a rise in temperature. In one bottle, we mix water with Alka Seltzer, producing CO2. In the other, we just have regular air and water. We measure, the temperature in both bottles in
2-5-minute increments.
We see:
● When light is shined (like the sun) on both bottles, the temperature inside both bottles increases.
● However, the temperature of bottle with the CO2 increases more.
We model the system we’re observing based on what is happening in the atmosphere. The top and sides of the bottle are also partly like our atmosphere. Our atmosphere lets in light, and it also keeps in particles (but not all of them).
We think the pattern we see in the bottle is similar to what happens in the atmosphere. When more carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere, it is then able to trap more heat.
Modelling our results to the atmosphere, we conclude that increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere can warm the temperature of the air around it and thus cause global temperatures to rise, not just locally.
We engage in Building Understandings discussion, to put together what we think we’ve figured out so far about the relationships among the human population, carbon dioxide, and temperature.
We’ve figured out that:
● In the Industrial Revolution, people started engaging in many activities that use fossil fuels.
● Using fossil fuels takes carbon out of the ground and burning it puts CO2 into the atmosphere.
● When there’s more CO2 in the atmosphere, it makes the atmosphere warmer by trapping heat
Since humans are adding more CO2 to the atmosphere, that helps explain why temperatures are increasing around the world.
● The increase in the burning of fossil fuels and other activities by human beings in the last 200+ years are contributing to temperature increases by releasing more CO2 into the atmosphere.
Do we really need to worry about whether humanity can survive the CO2 “crisis”? Like 0.04% CO2 now and 0.04% CO2 in 1890? Climate change is certainly no joke, because it is here, has always been here and will always be here. But CO2? The CO2 context makes it a hoax, I'm sorry to say. Tons of toxic substances are being sprayed day after day to stop the CO2 “crisis”. These substances are a real crisis, killing all life along with wireless radiation. And they are “justified” with the CO2 “crisis” just as other - pardon the pun - crap like smart cities and the whole dystopian future in slavery are explained with the CO2 crisis. For God's sake, do we really have to support this scam and thus dig up the abyss that is being prepared for us?
We need to quit using petroleum immediately and then 95% of humans will be dead in about a month and that will solve the climate change problem just in case climate changes caused by petroleum
I agree with Billy Bob. Social engineers (seemingly marxist/communicst leaning) are using climate as a weapon against us. Thankfully people are waking up around the world to the revolutionary spirit behind the lies surrounding Climate, Covid, 911, JFK, migration, etc. that have until recently gone relatively unchallenged due to media, education, publishing, government, justice, etc. being completely compromised. The pace of this attack on us is glacial, spanning more than 100 years.
Regarding 911, check out Christopher Bollyn's theories. Best I've heard so far at explaining the likely architects, managers, and executioners of the demolition of the first and only 3 steel-framed towers in history to collapse due to fire. The motives now are very clear to see, and the story couldn't be more relevant to fixing our corrupt government.
Climate change is up for honest debate or it is a control structured fraud. Science or scientism. Let us define and explore evil as a concept in my podcast here:
When the consistent & perpetual 'solution' is to restrict an individual's access to food, energy & travel, it's foolish not to be highly skeptical of the 'problem'. Isn't it strange how ALL the alleged problem issues of global significance are solved with arbitrary limits on individual freedom? Curious how the centralization/concentration of power is always part of the remedy.
I think this recent interview delivers one of the most crucial and important info on the planet right now. At around 1:45 the topic of free energy comes up.
Do publish the sources of evidence you read, Emanuel; We're all so gaslighted at the moment that we do not know where to turn to get to the truth.
Also, since climate change has been the main subject in all political discourse, the topic of global sooth and dangerous pollution have silently disappeared out of the debate.
Emanuel, your willingness to always put things on the table and allow everyone their freedom of speech and view is commendable and honorable. I truly appreciate that in anyone who upholds freedom of speech. I am a dedicated environmentalist if you could call it that, and used to be very caught up in the "climage chance" debate. That was years ago when the term was actually censored on many platforms such as Fox News (who woulda thunk!) Nonetheless, now the term is bandied about copiously. But it's the wrong term! Climage change is a misnomer because the climate is always changing and so we will have endless useless debates about that term. How about we call it what it really is - POLLUTION ? If we called it pollution then we would all see our part in it - and we all play a part in it. Just because petrochemical companies take advantage of our sloth, doesn't mean we're not similarly responsible. Because we buy their products and we waste, waste, waste so much. Yet we never point hte finger at ourselves. It's like the public always gets a free ticket when really - we are the ones with the power. What we do has all the meaning in the world. I truly admire your honestly. Thank you for always speaking up.
That is why I prefer the term “climate destabilization” rather than climate change.
Emanuel is completely correct, there is almost universal scientific consensus concerning the high levels of carbon in the atmosphere due to fossil fuel burning and the warming of the planet.
I would also say that the denial of the above is bound up with an inability to question the Capitalist system of endless growth as a driver of the degradation of the earth systems.
The good news is that there are energy sources sometimes termed “free energy” the exietence of which have been suppressed since before I was born. For more on that see the Substack of Wade Frazier.
netzero is a scam. Carbon is not our enemy. Carbon is not the knob that runs the climate. In the overall historyof atmospheric temperatures, we are nowhere near to being in a heat spike. See "Climate: The Movie"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A24fWmNA6lM
The climate change lobby has become a bloated, corrupt and monopolistic industry. Those who want to highlight climate change by and large avoid paying attention to the disastrous consequences of geo-engineering, much of it military. See "Carbon Is Not the Enemy. End Chemtrails!"
https://anthonyjhall.substack.com/p/carbon-is-not-the-enemy-end-chemtrails
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfRG8-RHEI
And what about geoengineering clouds - what do they do to affect the heat entrapment? And yes free energy - we are so twisted and abused by authorities that it's really difficult to get one's head around. But that we hold authorities in superiority to ourselves is really the underlying problem to all problems.
Yes, geoengineering is taking place as well as a means to try and offset the deleterious effects of climate collapse. Please check out weatherwar101 on YouTube which has as far as I can see the broadest view on this.
I hate to sound skeptical but who allowed them to do this? Why do they not explain it? How can it "mitigate climage collapse"? What is in those things? Is it causing poisoning of the water, soil or human and animal bodies? Why the secrecy around it? Is it to avoid having to answer questions that will expose the true purpose of "climate change", covid, 9/11, fluoridation of the water, GMO's, gender benders, and all the other schemes I haven't even mentioned that are direct attacks on nature and thus - ourselves?
I don't want to read through copious articles. Tell me why geoengineering is supposedly offsetting "climate collapse"? The mere term makes me squnt as the climate is different everywhere. Oh and by the way - how much has the water risen in 50 years? I see absolutely no rise whatsoever but I'm willing to hear other stories.
The chemtrails provide a medium of condensation for cloud formation which aids rainfall. Air pollution particles are generally too small to provide such a medium.
Oh. So chemtrails are good!? Sometimes the poisoned clouds are so thick they hover on the surface of the earth. From the taste, the smell, the sting is the eyes you can tell these chemical fog patches are toxic. If chemtrails are so good for us, why don't the perpetrators come forward to boast about it. Why is it all so hush hush?
I resent having our skies and our clean water and our fresh air stolen from us by dark shadowy forces. These forces seem to operate through similar tactics employed by those engaged in depopulating us, enfeebling us, and enslaving us through a variety of methods including jabbed us with bioweapon disguised as a remedy for a novel coronavirus. Chemtrails are composed of pollution. They are not a remedy for global warming and pollution.
Though I love your name, you provide no evidence to support that statement. And why weren't we told about it? Where did you hear about this? How do we know that would work? And what is in those things and how is "providing a medium of condensation for cloud formation" and what proof that it aids rainfall?
I looked for weatherwar101 on youtube and it seems like its latest video upload was from 6 years ago. Is that the channel you mean?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfRG8-RHEI
C02 is plant food and plants create oxygen
CO2 that comes from biological sources yes, but not CO2 that comes from car exhausts.
Sure there is genuine pollution that comes from exhausts. But concentrate on stopping the pollution, not on capturing CO2 and on Carbon sequestration.
Yes that's right. And if the UN was serious about capturing CO2 they would be espounsing the many benefits of growing and using hemp, bamboo and kenaf. But n'er a word about these...
If any of them were not serious about taking us back to the Stone Age, they would at least mention the Paris accords
carbon MONOXIDE comes from exhausts! ie CO ;-)
Like human carbon is dirty and needs to be sustainably recycled
They're eugenicists so yeah they think we non-billionaires ARE dirty and not worth living.
Your iracibility & lack of research highlights WHY James Corbett - & frankly myself too - can't be bothered dealing with indoctrinated Americans..
Mate, I shall say this only once
A. Climate change global warming is a ruse created by JFK & then LBJ to establish
"How the rich men of the Earth can control humanity in an extended time of peace"
Or IOW the SAME question the CARNEGIE FOUNDATION asked in 1911 when it decided there WAS NO ANSWER in a time of peace hence after the FED was criminally established via Wilson Treason THEY FUNDED WWI
In 1967 tho the 15 professionals asked recommended
1. A humanity uniting climate catastrophe
AND
2. A humanity uniting mock alien invasion replete with real USAF bombers
This total hogwash was then introduced by David Rockefeller to the Club of Rome 1968 & their UN has run with this carbon tax administrative tyranny & extortion ever since
Rockefeller & Brzezinski even created the Trilateral Commission in 1973 to coordinate their BS across the world
Sooo
SEARCH FOR
REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN - A BLUEPRINT FOR TYRANNY (1967)
And you will see - as James tires of pointing out - like everything else in your idiot country
THE VICTIM OF A CONFIDENCE TRICK
B. Avail yourself of
www.geoengineeringwatch.org
And Dane Wigington will demonstrate your CIA & US NAVY are evil WEF hijacked operations - as is the FED & AIPAC tbh
HAARP, NEXRAD, CLOUD GENERATING COOLING TOWERS - Directed Energy Weapons
Your DEEP STATE and the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX are at war TREASONOUSLY for the WEF
The Rothschilds own the US, they have since the 1933 bankruptcy to which Lord Lionel Walter the 2nd Baron was liquidator receiver..
THEY ARE BURNING WEST COAST AND DROWNING EAST COAST YOUR POPULATIONS INTO HOMELESSNESS
That you people know NOTHING about this is zero surprise
"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DROWN IN FALSE NARRATIVES"
Dr PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
UNDERSTATEMENT OF THE MODERN AGE
well said...the 'like' button is not responding.
Climate change is part of the industry of social engineering. Trillions and Billions of dollars and millions of jobs depend on the controversial aspects. Of course there’s climate change and it happens every second. The cumulative effects are nothing new under the sun.
Hello Emanuel, I thought I was the only one. Yes, Corbett has the wrong end of the stick about many things.There are so many in 'health freedom' who ridicule those who've looked into the evidence for climate change- I am convinced that they are not just reader supported either. I know for a fact that Free Speech Union and lockdown skeptic Toby Young is funded by BP. I have been blocked by many for pointing out the science on climate change https://jowaller.substack.com/p/oooo-now-ive-been-banned-by-mike?utm_source=publication-search
I would go further than you, I think the whole climate change twisting 'evil globalists' WEF agenda is itself a hoax deliberately created by the Heartland Institute https://jowaller.substack.com/p/what-is-the-heartland-institute?utm_source=publication-search as a cover up for fossil fuel industry Imperialism https://jowaller.substack.com/p/the-wef-agenda-of-depopulation-and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfRG8-RHEI
If organizations really believed that petrochemicals are damaging the climate, why do they continue to receive subsidies (and massive ones at that)? Why don't renewable energies receive the subsidies? All it is is a money-making venture like 9/11 was for weapons and surveillance manufacturers.
Why indeed. Of course fossil fuel industries know that petrochemicals are damaging the environment, just like big tobacco knew that smoking was harmful -that’s why they lobby government so hard - and continue to get subsidies. They also fund climate denial groups like the Heartland Institute to create doubt. Doubt is their product. Petrochemical imperialism and climate change are real-9/11, covid and climate change being a hoax are the hoaxes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfRG8-RHEI
When I still believed in the climate change hoax (yes, I too was once a lazy, ignorant conformist and dupe of the Globalists!) I felt distinctly uncomfortable when Corbett expressed his scepticism about the climate change hoax. Now, after a week of intense, cold rain in Europe, which has left death and destruction in its wake, I'm grateful that Corbett actually did his homework and spoke the truth. He was right and the lazy, ignorant, dupes of the Globalists were wrong. The belief in "global warming" is nihilistic and murderous and is no different to the brainwashing conducted by the Nazis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfRG8-RHEI
When you start valorizing guys that self-promote, and PT Barnum topics, well, then, here we are, no?
Systems thinking. Taking people out of their silos. Yeah, tell ice-core scientists from dozens of countries that they are in a conspiracy. Sure, Russian scientist studying ice cores and shelfs, they are in a conspiracy with Yankee scientists.
But again, mitigation, moving cities from vulnerable areas, collective action, well, that's not happening while wet bulb temperatures are going out the roof and killing people, and while floods occur, and infrastructure is abaondoned because of the Jewish Century of the Samson Option -- Middle East and Ukraine.
Making money on carbon credits? Making money on junk plastics? Making money on this or that scheme. Green is the new black.
Simple experiment third graders should be doing all over U$A, but in the U$A, K12 is sieg heil training to be compliant, feat the boss, be all you can be as a drone operator, maker or inventor of more dual use military killing devices.
Booby trapping minds, as John Taylor Gatto would say, RIP.
Last time, we saw a relationship between CO2 and temperature. We decided to investigate how more CO2 in the atmosphere can cause an increase in temperature.
We decide we need to design an investigation to model how more CO2 causes an increase in temperature.
We brainstorm some ideas for where we can find CO2 easily, and we remember that when soda fizzes, it releases CO2. We talk about ways we can create an easy but effective method to release CO2, capture it, and then be able to model how CO2 can cause an increase in air temperature.
We plan and carry out an investigation with two soda bottles, where we test out the idea that CO2 can cause a rise in temperature. In one bottle, we mix water with Alka Seltzer, producing CO2. In the other, we just have regular air and water. We measure, the temperature in both bottles in
2-5-minute increments.
We see:
● When light is shined (like the sun) on both bottles, the temperature inside both bottles increases.
● However, the temperature of bottle with the CO2 increases more.
We model the system we’re observing based on what is happening in the atmosphere. The top and sides of the bottle are also partly like our atmosphere. Our atmosphere lets in light, and it also keeps in particles (but not all of them).
We think the pattern we see in the bottle is similar to what happens in the atmosphere. When more carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere, it is then able to trap more heat.
Modelling our results to the atmosphere, we conclude that increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere can warm the temperature of the air around it and thus cause global temperatures to rise, not just locally.
We engage in Building Understandings discussion, to put together what we think we’ve figured out so far about the relationships among the human population, carbon dioxide, and temperature.
We’ve figured out that:
● In the Industrial Revolution, people started engaging in many activities that use fossil fuels.
● Using fossil fuels takes carbon out of the ground and burning it puts CO2 into the atmosphere.
● When there’s more CO2 in the atmosphere, it makes the atmosphere warmer by trapping heat
Since humans are adding more CO2 to the atmosphere, that helps explain why temperatures are increasing around the world.
● The increase in the burning of fossil fuels and other activities by human beings in the last 200+ years are contributing to temperature increases by releasing more CO2 into the atmosphere.
https://ceee.colorado.edu/sites/default/files/2020-03/Climate%20Resiliency%20MS8%20-%20Teacher%20Guide.pdf
https://ceee.colorado.edu/sites/default/files/2020-03/Climate%20Resiliency%20MS8%20-%20Teacher%20Guide.pdf
Essential viewing (for those genuinely interested in the truth): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfRG8-RHEI
Do we really need to worry about whether humanity can survive the CO2 “crisis”? Like 0.04% CO2 now and 0.04% CO2 in 1890? Climate change is certainly no joke, because it is here, has always been here and will always be here. But CO2? The CO2 context makes it a hoax, I'm sorry to say. Tons of toxic substances are being sprayed day after day to stop the CO2 “crisis”. These substances are a real crisis, killing all life along with wireless radiation. And they are “justified” with the CO2 “crisis” just as other - pardon the pun - crap like smart cities and the whole dystopian future in slavery are explained with the CO2 crisis. For God's sake, do we really have to support this scam and thus dig up the abyss that is being prepared for us?
We need to quit using petroleum immediately and then 95% of humans will be dead in about a month and that will solve the climate change problem just in case climate changes caused by petroleum
I agree with Billy Bob. Social engineers (seemingly marxist/communicst leaning) are using climate as a weapon against us. Thankfully people are waking up around the world to the revolutionary spirit behind the lies surrounding Climate, Covid, 911, JFK, migration, etc. that have until recently gone relatively unchallenged due to media, education, publishing, government, justice, etc. being completely compromised. The pace of this attack on us is glacial, spanning more than 100 years.
Regarding 911, check out Christopher Bollyn's theories. Best I've heard so far at explaining the likely architects, managers, and executioners of the demolition of the first and only 3 steel-framed towers in history to collapse due to fire. The motives now are very clear to see, and the story couldn't be more relevant to fixing our corrupt government.
Yes. We meed to maintain a steady focus on the usual suspects identified by Bollyn as the main engineers of the 9/11 scam.
Climate change is up for honest debate or it is a control structured fraud. Science or scientism. Let us define and explore evil as a concept in my podcast here:
https://soberchristiangentlemanpodcast.substack.com/p/s1-ep-2-scgp-rebroadcast
When the consistent & perpetual 'solution' is to restrict an individual's access to food, energy & travel, it's foolish not to be highly skeptical of the 'problem'. Isn't it strange how ALL the alleged problem issues of global significance are solved with arbitrary limits on individual freedom? Curious how the centralization/concentration of power is always part of the remedy.
https://substack.com/@calvinperrins115393/note/c-70689689?r=1sa22z
I think this recent interview delivers one of the most crucial and important info on the planet right now. At around 1:45 the topic of free energy comes up.
https://rumble.com/v5e6xet-black-budgets-stargate-raytheon-lockheed-skunk-works-uapufos-dr.-steven-gre.html
Do publish the sources of evidence you read, Emanuel; We're all so gaslighted at the moment that we do not know where to turn to get to the truth.
Also, since climate change has been the main subject in all political discourse, the topic of global sooth and dangerous pollution have silently disappeared out of the debate.