Our audience is not, stupid enough to fall for this primitive slight of hand game. The investment bankers, global bureaucrats and World Economic Forum pawns pushing a carbon-credit driven, fascistic government enabling, lockdown-promoting green growth smart city nightmare are not the people who fought to get climate change on the agenda and not the ones who need to be argued with. The reason no one will debate me is clear. They all know that I will tear them apart. I do not accept the bogus scare tactics about global warming, but I support a scientifically proven long-term catastrophic shift in the environment that will cause a massive decline in agriculture over the next 15 years, and threatens human extinction in the next 150 years.
So far I have some good suggestions for texts to read and videos to watch. I will follow up. But not a single person is ready to debate me. That is a give-away for sure. Let the debates begin in a scientific manner. I will bring up the outstanding research on global warming and the collapse of biodiversity that is out there and never mentioned by Al Gore and other frauds. I am waiting, for someone, anyone, to take up my challenge.
The three people I want most to debate with are Matthew Ehret, James Corbett and Whitney Webb. These three people have raised all sorts of questions about climate change in a manner that is not particularly scientific and which I think needs to be questioned directly. Because all three are best known for their revelation of deep frauds and state crimes, they have considerable strength in the international community. If they are promoting a view of the environment that is not scientifically supported, then that would be extremely serious indeed.
The UN Sustainability Agenda is a fraud established by the worst financial gangsters who want to sound benevolent and altruistic as they extract the last drops of middle-class wealth.
We are all aware that the establishment is using global warming as an excuse to create a world fascist totalitarian technocratic police state, and enslave humanity. Why does Emanuel defend that? Is he paid to support the rich people who are making this happen intentionally? Those are the real evil and exceedingly rich, the same ones who own oil. Why is he accusing those who do not accept carbon nonsense as being bought, when his position is more likely held for that reason? This is very suspicious. Anyway, from my book:
>>>>>>>I have started to describe very clearly how materialistic and capitalist America works, spelled out for you the description of evil.
“But America, as we know it, ain’t really so bad, you notice that for yourself. We can lead good, decent lives. We can just mind our own business, and stay out of trouble.”
I have two responses to that attitude. First: yeh, live and let die. Second: Appearances can be deceiving. I just wish it were that simple. As black a picture as I have painted, I am sorry to say that very soon, it is going to get a lot worse. Keeping to your own little world may work for you now, but not much longer. The illuminati have been cloaked in secrecy as they weave their web. Soon they will release their plan on earth. In my research I have found many ways and methods that they have planned to conquer us.
IMMINENT TRIBULATION
These are the plans to be implemented soon. Global warming. Hmmm. A good word for what has been taught us as being global warming would be geo-engineering. The change in weather, which is happening; is not caused by careless pollution. At least not due to unintentional causes. It is very intentionally and very deliberately planned and executed.
Do you remember that twenty-five, thirty years ago or more, that airplanes flying in the sky left a trail after them which lasted a couple of minutes? Well, you should recall that for a good ten or fifteen years, until just recently, airplanes left trails (called “chemtrails” in slang) lasting hours. Their paths criss-crossed in every which way, and some planes seemed to have no direction or planned destination. Many of those planes had no passengers, but they did have huge tanks of aluminum dioxide and magnesium oxide which they spewed all over the skies.
I remember that scientists were talking of ways to enable precipitation artificially using chemical means fifty years ago. I believe that these chemicals are related to H.A.A.R.P. (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), which are in Alaska, Mexico, and China. They are sets of about fifty immensely powerful transmitting radio towers set in a rectangle. They are targeted to a triangular area anywhere in the world. These towers can, and have, caused hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, birds falling from the sky dead, or fish and/or porpoises in the sea dying for no apparent reason.
We are told that pollution has caused global warming, with a major danger being in the “greenhouse effect gases.” While that fits in with what I just stated, their hot air about it being caused by automobiles emissions is what will prevail in the media and in legislation. Instead of developing technology (special oil mogul interest) to alter emissions, (we do already have electric automobiles), auto owners will be taxed according to carbon emissions and miles driven. This will drain our incomes.
I know, I know. Those genius scientists show with their complicated diagrams, complex illustrations, and scientific terminology (science-babble) how harmful all the carbon is to the planet. And no, I don’t pretend to understand it. Because it is all BS.
I was told as a youth (by Lewis Saper, the inventor of the heart defibrillator) that a trademark of a highly intelligent person is the ability to explain complicated matters in such a manner that anyone, even a child, could understand. The complicated explanations fed to you by the “experts” are intended to confuse you, impress you, and deceive you into thinking that they have valid points and highly developed cognitive abilities. Do not be deceived. It is all a “snow job.”
The simple truth is that plants breathe in carbon and breathe out oxygen. Animals breathe in oxygen and breathe out carbon. Plants and animals, using oxygen and carbon, are inter-dependent, they need each other and benefit one another.
NOW LET ME BRING HOME TWO HUGE POINTS
Do you want to save the planet? WE CAN. Plant a lot of organic (untouched in genetic alterations) fruit trees and vegetable farms and gardens. In yards, by the side of highways, in city parks, in empty fields, everywhere. Not only will there be a proper oxygen/carbon balance, but the result will also be that there will be enough food to feed the earth’s entire inhabitants for millenniums.
The same people who are overloading nuclear reactors, spilling oil all over the oceans, destroying our drinking water, destroying our food supply by altering its genetics; are telling us that we are overpopulating the planet. I watched Bill Gates do a speech on just that. First he came up with all kinds of statistics of how many people there would be on the planet decades from now. He then used statistics to show how much food we would have, of course the numbers indicated that we would not have enough.
He then gave some solutions to overpopulation. One of the solutions was vaccinations. That confused me at first. Aren’t vaccinations a way to promote more life? The answer came a few days later in my research. Another documentary revealed that some vaccinations in Africa funded by Gates caused about 47,000 deaths. Furthermore, I learned that Gates intends to reduce world population by 15% via means of vaccinations. In Chad, Gates-funded vaccinations recently caused 50 paralyzations. He also funds abortions.
It sounds like an agenda of death for this billionaire “philanthropist” (he publicly announced his generous contribution to abortions and like donations). Does that not enrage you? If not, there is something seriously wrong with you, as there is with that lovely murderer, Gates. Funny, but it seems he is keeping the larger portion of his billions. I hope he can survive with the little money that remains. I will always remember the portion you have given, Willy G.
Back to planting fruit trees and vegetables. Instead of manicuring grass lawns and watching television, we can grow edible and nutritious and tasty foods right in our yards. I don’t buy into the idea that the planet cannot feed ten, or even twenty billion people. Just get out of the cities, and you have suburbs with lawns and flowers, and non-fruit-bearing trees.
Replace them with food bearing plants. Drive further and you see fields and forests of useless trees, and other undeveloped land. That land could be utilized to feed multitudes.
In addition, there are many people who own farms who are being paid to not grow crops. Just have them grow alternative produce, if there are surplus in their crops. Israel has employed methods of irrigation to transform useless land into bountiful harvest. We can use their ideas to enrich our land into becoming rich in agriculture. Certainly every nation could learn as such. Replace cattle farms with produce, and the grain feeding them, into bread and cereal.
Combines and machinery used on large farms does not wield more, nor does it make land more profitable than if it was manually sowed, weeded, and reaped on the farms. We could make a remarkable change in the unemployed and prison populations by employing them on farms. Of course, taxes would decrease, and this would bring more purchasing power to the economy. In addition, it would be a better mode of living for inmates and relief for those not able to secure employment. Farm-work is healthy for body, mind, and soul; and promotes a good night’s sleep.
An ideal mode of living is a combination of kibbutz and the Amish mode of living.
Kahn, Michael Lewis. EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE: TYRANNY THROUGH GOVERNMENT, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, AND MEDIA DECEPTION (pp. 56-59). Kindle Edition.
The question that we need to ask is why are the rulers taking the measures that they are to correct the situation that they themselves created for their evil purposes? Why limit energy use rather than plant trees and other plants? What is their real agenda, if not slavery and death (look at Ukraine and Israel)?
Ever since I saw 'Planet of the Humans', the Michael Moore - Jeff Gibbs documentary, I don't know what to think anymore...There is a climate change , no doubt. What I do not understand is the fact that cleaning up global pollution is not on the agenda of corporations, governments, the WHO, COP -gatherings, Davos, you name it.
I don't know why anyone who pretends to be for the people would be debating on the side of the establishment which is using so called pollution-caused carbon related global warming which is being addressed with draconian measures. Anybody who would vote for him would be damn stupid. I remove any support I once had for him.
Nah, Emanuel, you just ain't in with the thousands of scientists worldwide working on this, from ice core folk, to climate paleotologists, to thousands of graduate students in China, USA, Europe, Russia, India.
Not sure what the debate will be, brother Emanuel.
I have had Peter Ward on my show, radio show, none of this fucking nonsense Podcast crap.
You know the ballot machines are rigged, and that politics is not what it seems. Why are you running for president? I am America's and the world's best hope for survival, and if you see me as a potential block to your personal ambition of being president, when the whole political field is corrupt and bought, that is a sure sign of your corruption and duplicity. I am not running for president. I will have nothing to do with those creeps in office. And if you want to be president, I want nothing to do with you. You have attended ivy league schools which you often mention in false humility. IN those universities they teach to feel like you are better and deserve more than others, that you are made to rule over the rest of us. You often complain of having nothing, being poor, but travel internationally often, an impossible task for those who are really that poor. I don't buy it. You wear the uniform of the dominant class, a suit, and a tailored one at that. You claim to be an intellectual, while we all know that intellectuals have failed in service to humanity, they have all been bought. You do not seem to accept conspiracy facts, but manage to sound knowledgeable while not mentioning the elephants in the room. Stop playing games. IF you want to fight, say so.
I would deeply appreciate you having a debate with Dr. Guy McPherson on how biosphere collapse can even POSSIBLY be averted, given the dozens of tipping points we've passed years ago. Check his website (or Paul Beckwith's); here's Guy's email:
I would appreciate a bona fide discussion on benign population reduction, consumption, and our relation with nature and each other.
I'm sad you didn't answer John Rachael's simple form, aka a promise to work for basic things Americans want. He put you on the long "no reply" list; I was hoping you'd be first. With all due respect, I encourage you to take a few minutes to do that. Trying to help, not hinder.
I am no fan of oil as fuel, there has been invented cars which run off of water, even sea water, and which have absolutely no polluting emissions. In addition there are better non-polluting options for other forms of technology. I take no offense, but there is NO viruses, and the allopathic medical system was created by rich wealthy and opportunistic John Rockefeller, who was not a doctor. It is very faulty, and the mercury and aluminum in vaccines does indeed make them dangerous to health as well as futile and even causing disease in later years. Your premises stink of conforming to past thinking which passed as knowledge until people realized that universities are breeding grounds of indoctrination and programming, bringing students into the establishment paradigms, and stifling scientific challenges, instead of questioning what passes as knowledge, students must memorize and repeat. IT looks like that is what you do.
Another old documentary on green energy. This addresses the so-called "solutions" promoted by the green deal. Look up Kerry's energy stocks. Keep in mind that Greta is a Rothschild. You need to stop trusting the establishment. They are liars.
There are plenty of real scientists out there who debunk the carbon myth. Jim Steele's book, Landscapes & Cycles, is a good starting place. There are many others.
Dear Bosun, I am happy to read Jim Steele's book in preparation for our debate. When might be a good time for you? Perhaps in two weeks? I think this debate will be immensely valuable to me and to the world overall.
You should get Jim Steele on for a debate! Or Judith Curry, the climate scientist who resigned her tenured position at Georgia Tech. That lady has integrity. There are many others. Tim Ball. Have you seen the documentary, 'The Great Global Warming Swindle'? I also recommend James Corbett's work on the climate scam. See Corbettreport.com and look for the climate tab.
Actually he is the one that I want to debate. No doubt about it. I think I will write him and make a formal request. But first I want to see his videos so I am sure I know what we agree on. But the two of us can debate first.
You are quick to debate, are you running for office still, even knowing the knowledge of politics and ballots? What is your motivation? Why are you doing this? Is it because you have nothing better to do, so you pick on ordinary people who you think will back down? James Corbett would be a strong debate, BUT YOU ARE INTERESTED IN DEBATING INFORMED PEOPLE WHO YOU THINK AGREE WITH YOUR PARADIGM. If you really want to seek truth, do so. IF you are running for president and this is to gain voters, say so. What is your purpose here? You come on and tell us that you want to debate. IF you want to debate Corbett, just email him. Just do it. Don't come out here and tell us that you are looking for a fight. You just might get somebody far more informed and stronger than you who will knock you out of the ring.
Instead of agreement, how about a search for truth? You and I are on the same page with much, and you are so far one person out of only two to interview me, even though it was only for a couple of minutes. I have no books for you to read on geoengineering, but to look up Geoengineeringwatch and Dane Wigington.
I have done research on many fields, including history, and have not been formally educated, so I am free of programming and indoctrination. Of course, I have read books on medicine, the justice system, the education system, the government, history, conspiracy theories, and the like, but not on global warming. I cut down the theory from the foundation.
If they are so sure that there is carbon poisoning our atmosphere, the obvious answer would be to employ plants' photosynthesis to relieve the problem naturally. Instead, the powers have instigated and initiated the burning of many forests and the destruction of the Amazon jungles, the most oxygen-creating resource on the planet. That should raise some deep suspicion.
I have solutions to every world problem, my work is considerably more important than almost if not everybody elses' as I have ideas that could not only save humanity, but bring about a civilization far better than any preceding one. Kindly call me to arrange interviews and subjects. Thorough discussion of my many solutions is an important venture and can greatly benefit mankind. If you are aware of arguments against my revolutionary ideas, kindly inform me, to prepare me for debate.
Our audience is not, stupid enough to fall for this primitive slight of hand game. The investment bankers, global bureaucrats and World Economic Forum pawns pushing a carbon-credit driven, fascistic government enabling, lockdown-promoting green growth smart city nightmare are not the people who fought to get climate change on the agenda and not the ones who need to be argued with. The reason no one will debate me is clear. They all know that I will tear them apart. I do not accept the bogus scare tactics about global warming, but I support a scientifically proven long-term catastrophic shift in the environment that will cause a massive decline in agriculture over the next 15 years, and threatens human extinction in the next 150 years.
It is about time that this debate happens and that it is visible on all media globally.
So far I have some good suggestions for texts to read and videos to watch. I will follow up. But not a single person is ready to debate me. That is a give-away for sure. Let the debates begin in a scientific manner. I will bring up the outstanding research on global warming and the collapse of biodiversity that is out there and never mentioned by Al Gore and other frauds. I am waiting, for someone, anyone, to take up my challenge.
The three people I want most to debate with are Matthew Ehret, James Corbett and Whitney Webb. These three people have raised all sorts of questions about climate change in a manner that is not particularly scientific and which I think needs to be questioned directly. Because all three are best known for their revelation of deep frauds and state crimes, they have considerable strength in the international community. If they are promoting a view of the environment that is not scientifically supported, then that would be extremely serious indeed.
The UN Sustainability Agenda is a fraud established by the worst financial gangsters who want to sound benevolent and altruistic as they extract the last drops of middle-class wealth.
https://youtu.be/24TH4MzuTWQ?si=AWMq8k02oqYf3x9R
Dear Charlotte, I most certainly agree with this point.
We are all aware that the establishment is using global warming as an excuse to create a world fascist totalitarian technocratic police state, and enslave humanity. Why does Emanuel defend that? Is he paid to support the rich people who are making this happen intentionally? Those are the real evil and exceedingly rich, the same ones who own oil. Why is he accusing those who do not accept carbon nonsense as being bought, when his position is more likely held for that reason? This is very suspicious. Anyway, from my book:
>>>>>>>I have started to describe very clearly how materialistic and capitalist America works, spelled out for you the description of evil.
“But America, as we know it, ain’t really so bad, you notice that for yourself. We can lead good, decent lives. We can just mind our own business, and stay out of trouble.”
I have two responses to that attitude. First: yeh, live and let die. Second: Appearances can be deceiving. I just wish it were that simple. As black a picture as I have painted, I am sorry to say that very soon, it is going to get a lot worse. Keeping to your own little world may work for you now, but not much longer. The illuminati have been cloaked in secrecy as they weave their web. Soon they will release their plan on earth. In my research I have found many ways and methods that they have planned to conquer us.
IMMINENT TRIBULATION
These are the plans to be implemented soon. Global warming. Hmmm. A good word for what has been taught us as being global warming would be geo-engineering. The change in weather, which is happening; is not caused by careless pollution. At least not due to unintentional causes. It is very intentionally and very deliberately planned and executed.
Do you remember that twenty-five, thirty years ago or more, that airplanes flying in the sky left a trail after them which lasted a couple of minutes? Well, you should recall that for a good ten or fifteen years, until just recently, airplanes left trails (called “chemtrails” in slang) lasting hours. Their paths criss-crossed in every which way, and some planes seemed to have no direction or planned destination. Many of those planes had no passengers, but they did have huge tanks of aluminum dioxide and magnesium oxide which they spewed all over the skies.
I remember that scientists were talking of ways to enable precipitation artificially using chemical means fifty years ago. I believe that these chemicals are related to H.A.A.R.P. (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), which are in Alaska, Mexico, and China. They are sets of about fifty immensely powerful transmitting radio towers set in a rectangle. They are targeted to a triangular area anywhere in the world. These towers can, and have, caused hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, birds falling from the sky dead, or fish and/or porpoises in the sea dying for no apparent reason.
We are told that pollution has caused global warming, with a major danger being in the “greenhouse effect gases.” While that fits in with what I just stated, their hot air about it being caused by automobiles emissions is what will prevail in the media and in legislation. Instead of developing technology (special oil mogul interest) to alter emissions, (we do already have electric automobiles), auto owners will be taxed according to carbon emissions and miles driven. This will drain our incomes.
I know, I know. Those genius scientists show with their complicated diagrams, complex illustrations, and scientific terminology (science-babble) how harmful all the carbon is to the planet. And no, I don’t pretend to understand it. Because it is all BS.
I was told as a youth (by Lewis Saper, the inventor of the heart defibrillator) that a trademark of a highly intelligent person is the ability to explain complicated matters in such a manner that anyone, even a child, could understand. The complicated explanations fed to you by the “experts” are intended to confuse you, impress you, and deceive you into thinking that they have valid points and highly developed cognitive abilities. Do not be deceived. It is all a “snow job.”
The simple truth is that plants breathe in carbon and breathe out oxygen. Animals breathe in oxygen and breathe out carbon. Plants and animals, using oxygen and carbon, are inter-dependent, they need each other and benefit one another.
NOW LET ME BRING HOME TWO HUGE POINTS
Do you want to save the planet? WE CAN. Plant a lot of organic (untouched in genetic alterations) fruit trees and vegetable farms and gardens. In yards, by the side of highways, in city parks, in empty fields, everywhere. Not only will there be a proper oxygen/carbon balance, but the result will also be that there will be enough food to feed the earth’s entire inhabitants for millenniums.
The same people who are overloading nuclear reactors, spilling oil all over the oceans, destroying our drinking water, destroying our food supply by altering its genetics; are telling us that we are overpopulating the planet. I watched Bill Gates do a speech on just that. First he came up with all kinds of statistics of how many people there would be on the planet decades from now. He then used statistics to show how much food we would have, of course the numbers indicated that we would not have enough.
He then gave some solutions to overpopulation. One of the solutions was vaccinations. That confused me at first. Aren’t vaccinations a way to promote more life? The answer came a few days later in my research. Another documentary revealed that some vaccinations in Africa funded by Gates caused about 47,000 deaths. Furthermore, I learned that Gates intends to reduce world population by 15% via means of vaccinations. In Chad, Gates-funded vaccinations recently caused 50 paralyzations. He also funds abortions.
It sounds like an agenda of death for this billionaire “philanthropist” (he publicly announced his generous contribution to abortions and like donations). Does that not enrage you? If not, there is something seriously wrong with you, as there is with that lovely murderer, Gates. Funny, but it seems he is keeping the larger portion of his billions. I hope he can survive with the little money that remains. I will always remember the portion you have given, Willy G.
Back to planting fruit trees and vegetables. Instead of manicuring grass lawns and watching television, we can grow edible and nutritious and tasty foods right in our yards. I don’t buy into the idea that the planet cannot feed ten, or even twenty billion people. Just get out of the cities, and you have suburbs with lawns and flowers, and non-fruit-bearing trees.
Replace them with food bearing plants. Drive further and you see fields and forests of useless trees, and other undeveloped land. That land could be utilized to feed multitudes.
In addition, there are many people who own farms who are being paid to not grow crops. Just have them grow alternative produce, if there are surplus in their crops. Israel has employed methods of irrigation to transform useless land into bountiful harvest. We can use their ideas to enrich our land into becoming rich in agriculture. Certainly every nation could learn as such. Replace cattle farms with produce, and the grain feeding them, into bread and cereal.
Combines and machinery used on large farms does not wield more, nor does it make land more profitable than if it was manually sowed, weeded, and reaped on the farms. We could make a remarkable change in the unemployed and prison populations by employing them on farms. Of course, taxes would decrease, and this would bring more purchasing power to the economy. In addition, it would be a better mode of living for inmates and relief for those not able to secure employment. Farm-work is healthy for body, mind, and soul; and promotes a good night’s sleep.
An ideal mode of living is a combination of kibbutz and the Amish mode of living.
Kahn, Michael Lewis. EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE: TYRANNY THROUGH GOVERNMENT, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, AND MEDIA DECEPTION (pp. 56-59). Kindle Edition.
The question that we need to ask is why are the rulers taking the measures that they are to correct the situation that they themselves created for their evil purposes? Why limit energy use rather than plant trees and other plants? What is their real agenda, if not slavery and death (look at Ukraine and Israel)?
Ever since I saw 'Planet of the Humans', the Michael Moore - Jeff Gibbs documentary, I don't know what to think anymore...There is a climate change , no doubt. What I do not understand is the fact that cleaning up global pollution is not on the agenda of corporations, governments, the WHO, COP -gatherings, Davos, you name it.
Planet of the Humans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk11vI-7czE
I don't know why anyone who pretends to be for the people would be debating on the side of the establishment which is using so called pollution-caused carbon related global warming which is being addressed with draconian measures. Anybody who would vote for him would be damn stupid. I remove any support I once had for him.
Yikes, man, is this it?
https://paulokirk.substack.com/p/greenie-weenies-the-love-of-cricket
Nah, Emanuel, you just ain't in with the thousands of scientists worldwide working on this, from ice core folk, to climate paleotologists, to thousands of graduate students in China, USA, Europe, Russia, India.
Not sure what the debate will be, brother Emanuel.
I have had Peter Ward on my show, radio show, none of this fucking nonsense Podcast crap.
https://vimeo.com/64407973
And Tim Flannery, to,
https://www.spokesman.com/audio/2010/may/14/tim-flannery/
Fuck it.
You will not get any takers, and Matt is cool, for sure.
He's more against the Club of ROme, all those fucking eugenicists.
You know the ballot machines are rigged, and that politics is not what it seems. Why are you running for president? I am America's and the world's best hope for survival, and if you see me as a potential block to your personal ambition of being president, when the whole political field is corrupt and bought, that is a sure sign of your corruption and duplicity. I am not running for president. I will have nothing to do with those creeps in office. And if you want to be president, I want nothing to do with you. You have attended ivy league schools which you often mention in false humility. IN those universities they teach to feel like you are better and deserve more than others, that you are made to rule over the rest of us. You often complain of having nothing, being poor, but travel internationally often, an impossible task for those who are really that poor. I don't buy it. You wear the uniform of the dominant class, a suit, and a tailored one at that. You claim to be an intellectual, while we all know that intellectuals have failed in service to humanity, they have all been bought. You do not seem to accept conspiracy facts, but manage to sound knowledgeable while not mentioning the elephants in the room. Stop playing games. IF you want to fight, say so.
I would deeply appreciate you having a debate with Dr. Guy McPherson on how biosphere collapse can even POSSIBLY be averted, given the dozens of tipping points we've passed years ago. Check his website (or Paul Beckwith's); here's Guy's email:
guy.r.mcpherson@gmail.com
I would appreciate a bona fide discussion on benign population reduction, consumption, and our relation with nature and each other.
I'm sad you didn't answer John Rachael's simple form, aka a promise to work for basic things Americans want. He put you on the long "no reply" list; I was hoping you'd be first. With all due respect, I encourage you to take a few minutes to do that. Trying to help, not hinder.
https://off-guardian.org/2024/01/02/climate-change-the-unsettled-science-part-3/ Have you reached out to Iain Davis? He just concluded a 3 part series on Off-Guardian. I do wish that this could be discussed rationally. It is a major point of conflict within my family and society and should be addressed publicly.
Scientists who proved that geo-engineering was caused by chemtrails
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_NYNt1I6-Q&t=6s
my website
https://truthforce.work
I am no fan of oil as fuel, there has been invented cars which run off of water, even sea water, and which have absolutely no polluting emissions. In addition there are better non-polluting options for other forms of technology. I take no offense, but there is NO viruses, and the allopathic medical system was created by rich wealthy and opportunistic John Rockefeller, who was not a doctor. It is very faulty, and the mercury and aluminum in vaccines does indeed make them dangerous to health as well as futile and even causing disease in later years. Your premises stink of conforming to past thinking which passed as knowledge until people realized that universities are breeding grounds of indoctrination and programming, bringing students into the establishment paradigms, and stifling scientific challenges, instead of questioning what passes as knowledge, students must memorize and repeat. IT looks like that is what you do.
I look forward to our debate on this topic. I will prepare for it and I am happy to read materials that you recommend. What might be a good time?
Another old documentary on green energy. This addresses the so-called "solutions" promoted by the green deal. Look up Kerry's energy stocks. Keep in mind that Greta is a Rothschild. You need to stop trusting the establishment. They are liars.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk11vI-7czE
There are plenty of real scientists out there who debunk the carbon myth. Jim Steele's book, Landscapes & Cycles, is a good starting place. There are many others.
Dear Bosun, I am happy to read Jim Steele's book in preparation for our debate. When might be a good time for you? Perhaps in two weeks? I think this debate will be immensely valuable to me and to the world overall.
You should get Jim Steele on for a debate! Or Judith Curry, the climate scientist who resigned her tenured position at Georgia Tech. That lady has integrity. There are many others. Tim Ball. Have you seen the documentary, 'The Great Global Warming Swindle'? I also recommend James Corbett's work on the climate scam. See Corbettreport.com and look for the climate tab.
Actually he is the one that I want to debate. No doubt about it. I think I will write him and make a formal request. But first I want to see his videos so I am sure I know what we agree on. But the two of us can debate first.
You are quick to debate, are you running for office still, even knowing the knowledge of politics and ballots? What is your motivation? Why are you doing this? Is it because you have nothing better to do, so you pick on ordinary people who you think will back down? James Corbett would be a strong debate, BUT YOU ARE INTERESTED IN DEBATING INFORMED PEOPLE WHO YOU THINK AGREE WITH YOUR PARADIGM. If you really want to seek truth, do so. IF you are running for president and this is to gain voters, say so. What is your purpose here? You come on and tell us that you want to debate. IF you want to debate Corbett, just email him. Just do it. Don't come out here and tell us that you are looking for a fight. You just might get somebody far more informed and stronger than you who will knock you out of the ring.
Wow...it would be nice to have that fight actually.
Instead of agreement, how about a search for truth? You and I are on the same page with much, and you are so far one person out of only two to interview me, even though it was only for a couple of minutes. I have no books for you to read on geoengineering, but to look up Geoengineeringwatch and Dane Wigington.
I have done research on many fields, including history, and have not been formally educated, so I am free of programming and indoctrination. Of course, I have read books on medicine, the justice system, the education system, the government, history, conspiracy theories, and the like, but not on global warming. I cut down the theory from the foundation.
If they are so sure that there is carbon poisoning our atmosphere, the obvious answer would be to employ plants' photosynthesis to relieve the problem naturally. Instead, the powers have instigated and initiated the burning of many forests and the destruction of the Amazon jungles, the most oxygen-creating resource on the planet. That should raise some deep suspicion.
I have solutions to every world problem, my work is considerably more important than almost if not everybody elses' as I have ideas that could not only save humanity, but bring about a civilization far better than any preceding one. Kindly call me to arrange interviews and subjects. Thorough discussion of my many solutions is an important venture and can greatly benefit mankind. If you are aware of arguments against my revolutionary ideas, kindly inform me, to prepare me for debate.