Covid 19 is a massive fraud. I could tell as soon as I started reading carefully in January, 2020. Climate change is exaggerated and manipulated but the overwhelming scientific evidence is clear. Although may be 100 years, not ten years, although it is about collapse biodiversity death of oceans ad well, and not just carbon, the evidence is overwhelming
Please, don´t forget, where mankind is coming from! We have been on an evolutionary path toward controlling the earth for the benefit of humans (e.g "The end of poverty" by. Jeffrey Sachs (who later lost course).
Alex Epstein´s "Fossil Future- the moral case for fossil fuels" describes this progress quite well and the fallacy of following the propagated return to pre-enlightened Middle Ages. Citizens are confronted with a fictitious threat to accept a fatal totalitarian dendustrialization and return to poverty and mere subsistence for the masses.
Those who dismiss the issue of climate alarmism have real, rather than fake science to back their assessment. Climate alarmism is (also) no more than a fraudulent scheme to deceit and exploit the scientifically uneducated mass.
Climate alarmism is an organized exploitation-scheme. I am intrigued, how well the deceit works despite the climate-gate revelations, long ago and despite the long history of bogous doomsday predictions (earth freezing, earth-overheating and drowning, drought-starvation ...) that have long since shown to consistently have been completely fictous and untenable when scientifically evaluated. Thanks for sharing this link https://slaynews.com/news/0-3-scientists-agree-humans-causing-climate-change/ on your nothingnew-website! This is fully in line with Alex Epsteins assessments: https://alexepstein.substack.com/p/the-ipccs-perversion-of-science
I stopped reading when the author / duface talked as if "Climate Change" AKA Globull Warming is real. It is not. It is a complete fraud. See ya! Won't be back.
“For climate change, there are many scientific organizations that study the climate. These alphabet soup of organizations include NASA, NOAA, JMA, WMO, NSIDC, IPCC, UK Met Office, and others. Click on the names for links to their climate-related sites. There are also climate research organizations associated with universities. These are all legitimate scientific sources.
If you have to dismiss all of these scientific organizations to reach your opinion, then you are by definition denying the science. If you have to believe that all of these organizations, and all of the climate scientists around the world, and all of the hundred thousand published research papers, and physics, are all somehow part of a global, multigenerational conspiracy to defraud the people, then you are, again, a denier by definition.
So if you deny all the above scientific organizations there are a lot of un-scientific web sites out there that pretend to be science. Many of these are run by lobbyists (e.g.., Climate Depot, run by a libertarian political lobbyist, CFACT), or supported by lobbyists (e.g., JoannaNova, WUWT, both of whom have received funding and otherwise substantial support by lobbying organizations like the Heartland Institute), or are actually paid by lobbyists to write Op-Eds and other blog posts that intentionally misrepresent the science.”
There are aspects of "climate change" that are overstated, and understated. But those who dismiss the issue normally cling to Greta and Al Gore and make no effort to engage the serious research. Most "climate change fraud" people are paid to track mud around the house.
With this accusation you are blindly propagating no more than the main-stream deceit aimed at filling the pockets of the cleptocrats who have invented the myth of a global threat to justify their totalitarian control over demand and supply. They substitute a market based with a planned economy with complete disregard of the economic interest and the well-being of the general public.
Look at the facts and the quality of the argument. Diffaming the authors is an inappropriate means to disqualify their findings. It is ypically used by main-stream media and activists who fail to win a substantiated dispute and try to deceit the public for their corrupt agenda.
Covid 19 is a massive fraud. I could tell as soon as I started reading carefully in January, 2020. Climate change is exaggerated and manipulated but the overwhelming scientific evidence is clear. Although may be 100 years, not ten years, although it is about collapse biodiversity death of oceans ad well, and not just carbon, the evidence is overwhelming
Please, don´t forget, where mankind is coming from! We have been on an evolutionary path toward controlling the earth for the benefit of humans (e.g "The end of poverty" by. Jeffrey Sachs (who later lost course).
Alex Epstein´s "Fossil Future- the moral case for fossil fuels" describes this progress quite well and the fallacy of following the propagated return to pre-enlightened Middle Ages. Citizens are confronted with a fictitious threat to accept a fatal totalitarian dendustrialization and return to poverty and mere subsistence for the masses.
In line therewith: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/09/resources/show-notes/sustainable-slavery-with-iain-davis-shownotes/
Those who dismiss the issue of climate alarmism have real, rather than fake science to back their assessment. Climate alarmism is (also) no more than a fraudulent scheme to deceit and exploit the scientifically uneducated mass.
Prof. Dr. Richard Lindzen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYWrehjaMFQ
Prof. Dr. Helmut Harde´s Climate-Science-revelations on http://hharde.de/climate.htm
Prof. Dr. Horst-J. Luedecke: https://www.horstjoachimluedecke.de/egu-poster
Dr. Rex Fleming „False Alarm: The Rise and Fall of the Carbon Dioxide Theory of Climate Change (2020)
.... and many hundreds of other unbiased scientists
Interesting analysis will be linking today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
Climate alarmism is an organized exploitation-scheme. I am intrigued, how well the deceit works despite the climate-gate revelations, long ago and despite the long history of bogous doomsday predictions (earth freezing, earth-overheating and drowning, drought-starvation ...) that have long since shown to consistently have been completely fictous and untenable when scientifically evaluated. Thanks for sharing this link https://slaynews.com/news/0-3-scientists-agree-humans-causing-climate-change/ on your nothingnew-website! This is fully in line with Alex Epsteins assessments: https://alexepstein.substack.com/p/the-ipccs-perversion-of-science
I stopped reading when the author / duface talked as if "Climate Change" AKA Globull Warming is real. It is not. It is a complete fraud. See ya! Won't be back.
“For climate change, there are many scientific organizations that study the climate. These alphabet soup of organizations include NASA, NOAA, JMA, WMO, NSIDC, IPCC, UK Met Office, and others. Click on the names for links to their climate-related sites. There are also climate research organizations associated with universities. These are all legitimate scientific sources.
If you have to dismiss all of these scientific organizations to reach your opinion, then you are by definition denying the science. If you have to believe that all of these organizations, and all of the climate scientists around the world, and all of the hundred thousand published research papers, and physics, are all somehow part of a global, multigenerational conspiracy to defraud the people, then you are, again, a denier by definition.
So if you deny all the above scientific organizations there are a lot of un-scientific web sites out there that pretend to be science. Many of these are run by lobbyists (e.g.., Climate Depot, run by a libertarian political lobbyist, CFACT), or supported by lobbyists (e.g., JoannaNova, WUWT, both of whom have received funding and otherwise substantial support by lobbying organizations like the Heartland Institute), or are actually paid by lobbyists to write Op-Eds and other blog posts that intentionally misrepresent the science.”
https://thedakepage.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/how-to-assess-climate-change.html
There are aspects of "climate change" that are overstated, and understated. But those who dismiss the issue normally cling to Greta and Al Gore and make no effort to engage the serious research. Most "climate change fraud" people are paid to track mud around the house.
With this accusation you are blindly propagating no more than the main-stream deceit aimed at filling the pockets of the cleptocrats who have invented the myth of a global threat to justify their totalitarian control over demand and supply. They substitute a market based with a planned economy with complete disregard of the economic interest and the well-being of the general public.
Look at the facts and the quality of the argument. Diffaming the authors is an inappropriate means to disqualify their findings. It is ypically used by main-stream media and activists who fail to win a substantiated dispute and try to deceit the public for their corrupt agenda.