Regarding control of the nuclear arms race, Freeman Dyson expressed the view that there comes a point when the increase in mutual checks becomes counterproductive, in that they start to generate more distrust.
Just as mistrust leads to checks, as emotion leads to action, also action itself creates a corresponding emotion. Thus arms proliferation control must be placed in the context of our intuitive considerations of human psychology, without which it it start to lead to more mistrust, paranoia, and more Cold War mentality....
Just one instance of the problem 'Who will control the controllers?'
The way out of this will be familiar to a scholar of the East.
It's exactly in what is imperceptible to those who obsess about security measures that we'll find that which would make the world resilient to the destructive actions and impulses.
Ruling elite psychos might believe a nuclear war is necessary to advance the Great Reset. π΅βπ«
Wish there were a lot more people talking like this running for office and in the state department!
Regarding control of the nuclear arms race, Freeman Dyson expressed the view that there comes a point when the increase in mutual checks becomes counterproductive, in that they start to generate more distrust.
Just as mistrust leads to checks, as emotion leads to action, also action itself creates a corresponding emotion. Thus arms proliferation control must be placed in the context of our intuitive considerations of human psychology, without which it it start to lead to more mistrust, paranoia, and more Cold War mentality....
Just one instance of the problem 'Who will control the controllers?'
The way out of this will be familiar to a scholar of the East.
It's exactly in what is imperceptible to those who obsess about security measures that we'll find that which would make the world resilient to the destructive actions and impulses.